Saturday, October 29, 2016

BBC Best Films of the 21st Century #8: Yi Yi

The BBC recently surveyed 177 international critics about their picks for the best films released since 2000. You can read the resulting list of 100 films here. Of course, no-one will ever entirely agree with cumulative lists like this, but it's a great place to start if you're interested in exploring the best of what modern movies have to offer. I will be reviewing the top 10 picks, and offer my opinion on what's great about them.

Directed by Edward Yang
Taiwan, 2000
Yi Yi was director Edward Yang's final film before his passing in 2007, at only 59 years old. Yang was one of a small group of young, ambitious filmmakers who emerged from Taiwan in the early 1980s collectively dubbed by critics the Taiwanese New Wave. With the loosening of censorship in Taiwan around that time, artists could finally explore the history and identity of their country with honesty. Yang and his peers made formally radical, ethically serious movies that were a reckoning with Taiwan's turbulent past and uncertain present.

If Hou Hsiao-Hsien is the Taiwanese New Wave's poet, Edward Yang is its novelist. His 1991 film A Brighter Summer Day is an intimately-scaled epic set among the youth of 1960s Taipei, who have formed street gangs to give them a sense of security and identity that their country, politically insecure and culturally stuck between China, Japan, and America, doesn't offer. A Brighter Summer Day has the richness of character and theme - and, at four hours long, the sheer size - of a great novel. Yang's 1986 film The Terrorizers is an unusually literate, clever exploration of modern urban living's dark side. It's the type of story that would become popular several decades later with the likes of Crash and Babel, a multi-stranded ensemble narrative about how contemporary life can make individuals simultaneously more interconnected and more alienated than ever before.


Yang's films are densely novelistic in their writing, but simple and precise in their visual storytelling. Before becoming a filmmaker, Yang had studied engineering and was fascinated by architecture. His films display the mind of an architect - his images are cleanly composed and aware of how space and shape can inform a scene's mood and meaning. He is always careful to situate characters within their surroundings, mostly in long shots that contextualize the characters and their behavior within the environments that shape them. Close-up images are rare in Yang's work, and always deliberately used. Yang also loved comic books and animation - his planned, tragically unfinished follow-up to Yi Yi was going to be an animated martial arts saga. Even his live-action films display the sensibility of a cartoonist, who tell their stories through single panels and express character and emotion with simplified pen-and-ink sketches. Lone images of Yi Yi tell mini-stories of their own, which gain broader meaning in dialogue with the surrounding images; characters' simple gestures express depths of comedy or tragedy. In other words, Edward Yang was a true craftsman - nothing in his films feel accidental.

Despite all the acclaim he's received, Edward Yang's movies are frustratingly difficult to find. Yi Yi was his only film to receive a theatrical release in the United States - sad, but perhaps not surprising. It might be his most easily accessible film, as it is less specifically tied to Taiwan in its meaning than Yang's previous works, and tells a universally relatable story. Yi Yi begins with a wedding and ends with a funeral, and between shows the stages of life - birth, childhood, adolesence, adulthood, old age - through three generations of the ordinary Jian family.


Between the family gatherings that bookend the film, the Jians are almost always shown separately. Like many modern families, the Jians may share a roof but live mostly in isolation from each other - not because there's a lack of love or open dysfunction between them, but because they each have their own burdens to quietly grapple with amid the many distractions of 21st century city life.

Immediately after her son A-Di's wedding, the Jian grandmother, the beloved backbone of the family, falls into a coma. Doctors are not optimistic about her recovery, but encourage the family to take turns talking to her - as she might still hear them and it could help her return to consciousness. Their one-sided conversations with her become like confessions, revealing their innermost questions and longings.

NJ, her son-in-law, is a melancholy and distracted but gentle man. He notes while talking to grandma that it feels like prayer - "I'm not sure if the other party is listening, and I'm not sure if I'm sincere enough." What NJ really craves is sincerity. He doesn't find it in his work - a dull career in the video game industry, surrounded by co-workers who lack any ambition or integrity beyond the pursuit of profit. His marriage has become a benign but lukewarm partnership lacking in romance or friendship. Two figures enter NJ's static life and shake him out of complacency. He runs into an ex-girlfriend, Sherry, the first love of his life, now a successful businesswoman married to an American. From this abrupt, awkward encounter it's clear that strong bittersweet feelings still exist between them. He meets up with Sherry again in Tokyo and they reminisce on their past together and the possibilities of their future. At the same time NJ meets Ota - a Japanese businessman who also works in video games, but does so with a creative spirit that does not segregate business from morals, or art from commerce. He lives with the kind of passionate, engaged authenticity that NJ desires in his own life. Their friendship, which develops over the course of business meetings that turn into philosophical discussions, is surprising and endearing.


NJ's wife, Min-Min, takes the duty of talking to her mother seriously, and every night talks about what she'd done that day. But this leads to an unexpected personal crisis - Min-Min realizes that every day of her life seems exactly the same, and that she has very little of interest to talk about. "How can there be so little?" she asks, disconsalate at the realization of her life's lack of purpose. Hoping to find meaning again, she retreats to a monastery for an extended stay. Both NJ and Min-Min have reached mid-life crises, regretting either the choices they've made or their lack of intention in life, and realizing with frightening clarity: this is it, and perhaps all it ever will be.

Min-Min's brother, A-Di, is a mess. He's newly married, but immediately rekindles a relationship with his equally damaged ex-girlfriend. He's deep in debt, getting scammed by his scummy friends, and generally in denial about the disaster he's made of his life. He brags to his comatose mother about his various accomplishments and all the money he's making, as if trying to convince her and above all himself that it's true, but falters and falls silent. Perhaps her nonresponsiveness makes the hollowness of his own words harder to ignore. A-Di is a pathetic but poignant illustration of a certain, and particularly male, type of insecurity and despair.


NJ and Min-Min's teenage daughter, Ting-Ting, feels personally responsible for her beloved grandma's condition. Her grandmother was discovered unconscious by the garbage bins outside, and Ting-Ting realizes that she had forgotten to take out the trash earlier that day. She sneaks into her grandmother's room at night and tearfully asks her to wake up, because then she will feel forgiven. Her guilty feelings are compounded when she innocently becomes involved in a romantic triangle with troubled neighbor girl Lili and a moody boy nicknamed Fatty, and witnesses glimpses of the sordid lives of her next-door neighbors. Her first steps into adulthood are fraught with danger and confusion. "Why is the world so different from what we thought it was?"

Ting-Ting's younger brother, Yang-Yang, is a curious and watchful little kid with the conscience of a budding artist. He does not initially talk to grandma - she cannot see what he does and cannot respond, so he fails to see the point. This gets him thinking, in his own childish but nonetheless serious and thoughtful way, about the reality of different perspectives. He asks his dad: since we cannot see out the back of our heads but only what's in front of us, do we only see half the truth? His dad gifts him with a camera, which Yang-Yang uses to explore the world around him. He especially likes photographing the back of people's heads. This confuses NJ until he hears Yang-Yang's simple explanation - "you can't see it, so I've shown you."


Yi Yi is three hours of a family's everyday doubts and struggles, which may sound heavy, but Edward Yang has created a film with a beautiful lightness of touch. It's long but uses that length well, to envelop the viewer in its world so it can become vividly detailed and alive. Yi Yi is meditative and never melodramatic, emotionally expressive but never manipulative. It's also threaded through with sly visual jokes. In one memorable scene, NJ is visited by Min-Min's spiritual guru. We see Yang-Yang playing in the bath with his tub toys while we hear the adults talking in the next room, the conversation dominated by the monk's didactic evangelizing about the superiority of monastic life. Yang-Yang sneaks past the grown-ups into the kitchen to find a funnel for his bathtub experiments, and his towel unceremoniously falls off at the same moment as the monk finally reach his point - his whole highfaulting speech has been a pretext for asking NJ for money. Yang-Yang's sudden nudity humorously coincides with the reveal of the monk's pretension. Yi Yi is full of similarly lovely, witty grace notes.

Yi Yi's subtitle for its American release was "A One and a Two", which is an attempt to translate the title's meaning in Chinese. The title is a Chinese character made of two slashes stacked on top of each other, each signifying the number 1 on their own but 2 when put together. This must have been deliberate wordplay on Edward Yang's part, as every character in Yi Yi is alone but simultaneously connected to the others, in more ways than they perceive. Take as an example the scene that cuts between NJ and Sherry swapping memories of their first date decades ago, and Ting-Ting embarking on a first date with Fatty. We hear NJ and Sherry talking about nervously holding hands for the first time, while we see Ting-Ting and Fatty doing exactly the same thing. The two couples become a mirror of each other, though one date is unfolding in Tokyo and one in Taipei, with hundreds of miles and decades in age separating them. They are united by the shared nervousness and excitement of their experiences, the scary romantic thrill of finding a private space with another person in the middle of a busy world. Yang finds similar connections between all the characters, their hopes and fears are somehow both unique and universally shared.


The beauty of Yi Yi lies in how it captures the patterns that tie the Jians to each other, though they often do not notice, being too perplexed by the disappointments and tragedies of life. But in the film's last act, the Jians begin to see themselves, and each other, more clearly. Min-Min and NJ realize that their attempts to escape did not bring them any more fulfillment - that the problem was not the reality of their lives, but how they perceived them. Ting-Ting experiences life's cruelty and unfairness, but also encounters grace in a climatic scene that could be a miracle. Considering that Yi Yi is entirely realistic up to that point, the break with everyday reality should be jarring, but it isn't. Yi Yi may be mundane on its surface but has a spiritual undercurrent that gives even the most everyday events a luminous quality. The miracle is portrayed as matter-of-factly as everything else, and is astonishing in its quiet, cathartic power.

Yang-Yang gets the final word in Yi Yi, as he finally decides to speak to grandma. Despite coming from the naive perspective of a little kid, his words carry great weight. "Do you know what I want to do when I grow up? I want to tell people things they don't know. Show them stuff they haven't seen. It'll be so much fun." That could be Edward Yang's mission statement. He achieved just that with Yi Yi - he looks at ordinary lives and discovers wonder and mystery there.

The BBC Top 10: 
  1. Mulholland Drive
  2. In the Mood for Love (previously reviewed)
  3. There Will Be Blood
  4. Spirited Away
  5. Boyhood
  6. Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind
  7. The Tree of Life
  8. Yi Yi
  9. A Separation
  10. No Country for Old Men

Saturday, October 15, 2016

BBC Best Films of the 21st Century #9: A Separation

The BBC recently surveyed 177 international critics about their picks for the best films released since 2000. You can read the resulting list of 100 films here. Of course, no-one will ever entirely agree with cumulative lists like this, but it's a great place to start if you're interested in exploring the best of what modern movies have to offer. I will be reviewing the top 10 picks, and offer my opinion on what's great about them.

Directed by Asghar Farhadi
Iran, 2011
A Separation received exceptional acclaim and success on its release in 2011. The critical response was unanimously great, and the movie earned nearly 8 million dollars in the United States - a tiny amount compared to the average Hollywood release, but a smash hit compared to the average Middle Eastern film, which rarely crack a million in box office earnings. It was nominated for Best Screenplay at the Academy Awards - an uncommon achievement for a film not written in English - and won for Best Foreign Language Film, a first for an Iranian movie.

Part of A Separation's enthusiastic reception was likely due to its novelty with many non-Iranians. In the United States, Iran is known mostly for its repressive government and politics, for nuclear fears and sexism. A Separation was an eye-opener for many. It's an intimate study of everyday people who live in a culture alien to most outside Iran's borders. A Separation was less novel to those who had been following Iranian filmmaking - a unique film culture that produced artists like Abbas Kiarostami and Mohsen Makhmalbaf, who had been making films of startling poetry and clarity since the 1970s despite restrictive censorship from their government. It was even less surprising to those who had seen previous Asghar Farhadi films like Fireworks Wednesday or About Elly, noteworthy for their multi-layered characters and intricate stories.


However, no matter how fascinating it is as a rare honest glimpse into a foreign culture, the main appeal of A Separation is not educational - it's just a tremendously good movie, the work of a master storyteller. Before becoming a filmmaker, Asghar Farhadi studied theater. His theater experience shows in his carefully structured, dialogue-driven screenplays. Farhadi's genius as a screenwriter lies in how he reveals the motivations of his characters and shows how everyone has reasonable cause to believe what they do, even as their individual perspectives fall disastrously short of the whole truth.

A Separation begins with a simple but difficult ethical quandary. By the end, the varying truths and lies told have woven an enormous web of moral questions, which the characters have created and cannot escape. Nader and Simin want a divorce. She wants to leave the country to provide a better life for their young daughter, Termeh, and their visa expires soon. He needs to stay to care for his Alzheimer's-afflicted father. During the divorce, Simin leaves home to live with her mother. Due to her absence, Nader hires a young woman, Razieh, to become his father's caretaker while he's at work. One day Nader returns home to find Razieh gone, and his neglected father injured after a collapse. Razieh returns to a furious Nader, who also accuses her of stealing before violently shoving her out the front door. Nader later learns that Razieh ended up in the hospital, suffering a miscarriage soon after their argument. Razieh and her hotheaded husband, Hodjat, take Nader to court, accusing him of causing her miscarriage by his aggression - an accusation that, if proven, would equal a murder sentence.


If there's a running theme connecting the Iranian films I've seen, it's the quest for truth. What is truth? How do we determine it? Maybe this search for truth in Iranian film arises from the urgent importance placed on certain virtues in Islamic Middle Eastern cultures, such as righteousness, justice, and honor. Maybe it's a reaction to a government with a totalitarian claim on The Truth in all aspects of life: religious, social, individual. The best, most conscientious artists cross-examine the accepted mores of their societies, and Asghar Farhadi is particularly bold in that regard. A Separation is about the impossibility of determining a singular, objective truth. Everyone's version of the truth is formed by their own limited perspective, their self-interest, justifications, and misunderstandings.

Where do we find truth? Turning to official, society-mandated truth often provides no satisfying answers. A Separation's opening credits unfold over images of passports being scanned - the elements of an individual collated onto an official document, proof of a person's existence even as it flattens and dehumanizes them due to bureaucratic necessity. The government courts of A Separation - fascinatingly different from the legal system in America - apply rigid moral judgments, drawn from the Qur'an and Iranian law, to messy human lives that don't fit in such neat boxes of right and wrong.


But individual perspectives in A Separation are often no more truthful. The opening scene is the film in miniature. Nader and Simin tell their reasons for seeking divorce to a judge. The dissolution of their marriage has been caused by, ironically enough, devotion to family members. Simin wants a better, freer life for her daughter - when the judge huffily asks why she believes Iran would not provide a good future for Termeh, Simin's silence and confrontational stare speaks volumes. Nader wants to be a good son and not uproot his already-fragile father from his home, or place him in a hospital. Their decisions are motivated by good, right things, but have nevertheless brought them to an ugly, wrong place - a formerly loving couple, now divided and spiteful. Farhadi's staging of the scene is simple but brilliant - the couple sit facing the camera, putting the audience in the place of the judge. This immediately draws us, the viewers, into their dilemma, making us more than passive spectators but directly involving us as judges to their case.

I found my judgments, and sympathies, constantly shifting throughout the film. Nader's anger with Razieh was justified. She had neglected her job, putting his father in danger. We see the depths of love he has for his father when he returns home to find him sprawled on the floor, hardly breathing. Determining he is alive and not seriously injured, Nader cradles him in his arms, weeping with relief. His fury with Razieh is largely a way to vent his fear. But his violence is cruel and unjustified, and has unforeseen consequences.


Razieh's duplicity proves destructive to everyone around her. She lies to Hodjat about the nature of her job, since he would not approve of her working alone in a man's apartment. She does not tell the truth about why she left Nader's father alone. And she neglects to mention all the events leading up to her miscarriage, which would throw reasonable doubt onto Nader's complicity in the tragedy. But she also lives under enormous pressure from the impossible demands of her strict religiosity and oppressive husband - her circumstances force her to be duplicitous to survive. One small scene reveals much about Razieh. She calls some sort of religious hotline to get the Islam-approved answer to a problem: Nader's father has wet his pants and it is her duty to clean him - but he cannot undress himself, and it is a sin for her to be in the presence of an undressed man apart from her husband. She is caught between the threat of damnation and the necessities of life, and is not always honest in negotiating the two.

Similarly, her husband Hodjat's plight is sympathetic even as his behavior is despicable. He carries himself as a man who has been mistreated his whole life. He has lost his job and been jailed for failing to pay his creditors, resulting in a terrible bout of depression. He cannot find work and feels emasculated by his wife working to pay the bills behind his back. Hodjat has become hyper-religious and quick to anger to compensate for his failings. Once his wife loses her baby, he finds in Nader an easy scapegoat for all his problems. It is easy to characterize Nader - middle-class, educated, successful - as The Man, a symbol of all his oppressors. Similarly, it was easy for Nader to accuse Razieh of theft (wrongly, we learn) because he views her as lower-class and uneducated. The stark difference in their lives is illustrated by their apartments. Simin and Nader's home is well-furnished, marking them as comfortably middle-class, and filled with stacks of books, showing that they are educated. Razieh and Hodjat's apartment shows their poverty, with its barren walls and floors, and generations of their family living in a few small rooms. Considering the very different environments that have shaped them, when presented with the same sequence of events how could these people possibly arrive at the same conclusions?


Another characteristic that many Iranian films share is the prominent use of children as major characters. This is for a multitude of reasons - some of them subversive, as supposed children's films are less likely to be accused of anti-government / anti-Islamic content, so filmmakers can sneak social criticisms beneath censors' noses. Often it's for the sake of contrast, as the guileless, faithful perspective of children reveals the hypocrisy and cynicism of the adult world - and this is certainly true of A Separation. Termeh remains faithful to both her parents, watching them intently and trying to ascertain what is right. She is put in the impossible position of having to choose between them, and the terrible cost of divorce is written on her face.

A Separation is not always pleasant to watch, but I urge you to do so anyways. Farhadi's script deserves to be counted among the all-time great screenplays. It is full of perfectly-timed twists and revelations without ever feeling contrived, and creates the suspenseful urgency of a thriller not from the threat of violence but from moral dilemmas and the weight of characters' decisions. This is a movie of rare intelligence and integrity.

The BBC Top 10:
  1. Mulholland Drive
  2. In the Mood for Love (previously reviewed)
  3. There Will Be Blood
  4. Spirited Away
  5. Boyhood
  6. Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind
  7. The Tree of Life
  8. Yi Yi
  9. A Separation
  10. No Country for Old Men

Friday, October 7, 2016

BBC Best Films of the 21st Century #10: No Country for Old Men

The BBC recently surveyed 177 international critics about their picks for the best films released since 2000. You can read the resulting list of 100 films here. Of course, no-one will ever entirely agree with cumulative lists like this, but it's a great place to start if you're interested in exploring the best of what modern movies have to offer. I will be reviewing the top 10 picks, and offer my opinion on what's great about them.


Directed by Joel and Ethan Coen
United States, 2007
*Review contains plot spoilers
I hadn't watched No Country for Old Men since its release nearly a decade ago, but I still vividly remembered every scene. It's that kind of movie: whatever you think of it, it makes a lasting impression.

It's intensely scary, to start with. No Country for Old Men builds tension with ruthless patience. Everything about the film has an eerie starkness. The action unfolds in vast Texas deserts and empty motel rooms. There is no score. Even a horror film score would have offered a certain comfort, informing the viewer how to feel, and unconsciously reminding them of the film's artifice. In No Country for Old Men, the silence is unsettling. Every small sound gains sinister significance - the hiss of a cattle stungun, the beeping of a tracking device, the muffled patter of shoeless feet on concrete. When shotgun blasts tear through the quiet with shocking violence, it's enough to give you a panic attack.


The story begins as a straightforward cat-and-mouse thriller. Llewelyn Moss (Josh Brolin) stumbles on the aftermath of a botched drug deal in the desert - bullet-ridden corpses, abandoned stacks of cocaine, and a satchel full of hundred-dollar bills. He takes the money, unaware that a tracker is hidden in the cash, putting psychopathic bounty hunter Anton Chigurh (Javier Bardem) on his tail, while a world-weary lawman (Tommy Lee Jones) surveys the carnage they leave behind.

The performances are across-the-board excellent. Josh Brolin plays a prototypical Coen Brothers character - an everyman who, through his own foolish decisions and thoughtless ambition, gets into deep trouble. Tommy Lee Jones brings a wounded soul to Sheriff Bell, a good man who has been spiritually exhausted by all the violence and evil he encounters on the job. Scottish actress Kelly Macdonald puts on an impressively believable Texan accent as Llewelyn's wife Carla Jean, a woman who initially seems naive but reveals surprising depths of courage.


Yet the standout is clearly Javier Bardem as the evil Chigurh. Just as Llewelyn is a classic Coen character, Chigurh is an archetypal figure of Cormac McCarthy, who wrote the novel No Country for Old Men. He's an unfathomable figure of pure malignance, a walking embodiment of evil, but bizarrely principled in his predatory instincts - a cousin to the Judge of Blood Meridian or Malinka of The Counselor. Playing an individual of total evil is a challenge for any actor (see Cameron Diaz's admirably committed but not-quite-convincing performance in The Counselor as evidence of how it can fall flat), but Bardem rises to the challenge with terrifying results. It's partially his physical appearance - the handsome Bardem stifles his natural charisma behind a freakishly incongruous pageboy haircut and alarming bulbous eyes. He moves with the steady precision and quiet of a predatory cat. Chigurh is amused by his own sadism and enjoys toying with his prey. Most memorably, he cruelly taunts a bewildered old man working at a gas station. "What's the most you've ever lost in a coin toss?" Chigurh growls, cryptically making it known that the old man's life is on the line, for seemingly no other reason than his attempts at small talk were bothersome.

That sequence makes clear what a harmonic convergence of very distinctive artists No Country for Old Men is. It displays the Coen Brothers' penchant for quirky characters, rich regional language, and darkly comic dialogue; at the same time, it exemplifies Cormac McCarthy's terse prose and fatalistic philosophy. No Country for Old Men is as accomplished and technically brilliant as anything the Coen Brothers have directed. It's all in the details. I've already mentioned the immersive sound design, but Roger Deakins' cinematography is just as noteworthy. A chase through the desert, backlit by a budding sunrise, is all the more heart-stopping for its harsh beauty. Deakins' images capture a level of textured detail that feels hyperreal, recalling our animalistic heightened senses when in danger. No Country for Old Men is a masterwork of film craft.


As if typical of both McCarthy and the Coens, No Country for Old Men may begin as a simple thriller, but ultimately upends expectations. The entire film appears to be building towards a showdown between our protagonist and antagonist, one that never comes. The last act does resolve the story, but not in the dramatically satisfying way you would expect - it offers no catharsis. This may be generically disappointing, but it's exactly the point.

"You make your own destiny" about sums up the ethos of so many American westerns and action films. Even mistakes - like, for example, Llewelyn taking the money - can be corrected with determination and ingenuity, and our hero can ride off triumphantly into the sunset. Cormac McCarthy does not believe that. Llewelyn does, but it does not stop his fate - gunned down ingloriously, a scene that the Coens perversely leave off-screen. Sheriff Bell is ultimately disillusioned of that belief - he may be sheriff, but he is not truly in control. "It ain't all waiting on you. That's vanity."


Cormac McCarthy's unrelentingly bleak worldview sometimes strikes me as contrived, but it's also a necessary and humbling corrective to so much of America's mythology, which can be blindly and selfishly optimistic. Fate and evil can overtake anyone, no matter how clever or good. I've read before, though I can't recall where, that Cormac McCarthy has a Catholic conscience without the redemption. His stories are convicted of the existence of evil and mankind's weakness, and there is nothing we can do in our own power to escape either. The best we can do is, like Sheriff Bell, be resigned to the existence of evil and hold a faint hope for the afterlife - represented by his dream, where he searches for his late father through a snowstorm, knowing that he will be waiting for him with a warm fire ready. Or, like Carla Jean, we can stick to our principles even in the face of inescapable fate. "I ain't gonna call it. The coin don't have no say."

I'll admit that I yearned for a character equivalent to Fargo's Marge Gunderson or True Grit's Mattie Ross - two characters from other Coen Brothers films whose goodness really has power in a world overtaken by chaos and evil. Some might call that wish sentimental, but I think it's closer to the truth. No Country for Old Men demands and deserves respect. It's the work of masters at the peak of their powers. Yet I admire but do not love it - not in the way I love Fargo or True Grit, or even McCarthy's novel The Road, which may present a massively depressing vision of the apocalypse but leaves room in its moral universe for selfless love that transcends evil.

The BBC Top 10:
  1. Mulholland Drive
  2. In the Mood for Love (previously reviewed)
  3. There Will Be Blood
  4. Spirited Away
  5. Boyhood
  6. Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind
  7. The Tree of Life
  8. Yi Yi
  9. A Separation
  10. No Country for Old Men